Law vs. the Truth

This two-part book provides critical analysis of the Richard D. Hall case and the Manchester Arena incident of May 22, 2017. The eight chapters of Part 1 set out the key facts about the Hall case, outline the main forensic evidence in relation to the Manchester Arena incident, assess the Summary Judgment against Hall, reject the Judgment that Hall was guilty of harassment and of abusing media freedom, reject the High Court's appeal to authority over truth, reject the contention that Hall caused anyone unnecessary anxiety and distress, and clarify the implications of the Hall case for the independent media. Part 2 explores the emergency response on May 22, 2017, sets the incident in the context of counter terrorism, considers potential operatives on the night, critiques the police investigation and the public inquiry, attempts to map the locations of named fatalities, examines claims made about injuries and blood, asks critical questions about named survivors and their testimonies, asks what medical treatment was given on the night, and explores the Casualty Clearing Station. The conclusion reflects on the deeper implications of the Hall case and the Manchester Arena incident.