Doprava zdarma při nákupu nad 1 499 Kč přes Zásilkovnu nebo PPL Box.

Zjistit stav objednávky

Staňte se součástí komunity milovníků knih z celého světa a získejte hromadu výhod. Založit účet zdarma

Doprava zdarma se Zásilkovnou nad 1 499 Kč

Kurýr DPD 69 Kč PPL shop 49 Kč Balíkovna 69 Kč PPL kurýr 74 Kč PPL box 39 Kč Balíkovna 49 Kč Výdejní místo DPD 49 Kč Zásilkovna 39 Kč

Kontakt

Jak nakupovat

Pomoc

Můj účet

▸ Prázdný :-(

Doprava zdarma při nákupu nad 1 499 Kč přes Zásilkovnu nebo PPL Box.

Law as it Could Be

Name: Law as it Could Be
Brand: New York University Press
SKU: 04931204
Price: 1017 CZK
Availability: InStock
Author: Owen Fiss
ISBN: 9780814727263

Owen Fiss

Jazyk

Angličtina

Kniha Brožovaná

Libristo kód: 04931204

Nakladatelství New York University Press, září 2003

The Law As It Could Be gathers Fiss's most important work on procedure, adjudication and public reas... Celý popis

Libristo kód: 04931204

102 b

1 017 Kč

Skladem u dodavatele Odesíláme za 14-21 dnů

Až 30 dní na vrácení zboží

Zákazníci také koupili

Do raja Hanya Yanagihara

Pevná

606 Kč

Los donaires de Matico Lope de Vega

Adobe ePub DRM

228 Kč

CARTAS A ALICIA ALBERDI ALONSO

Brožovaná

477 Kč

Thomas Sankara Wanafrica

Brožovaná

306 Kč

Tlumaczenie symultaniczne z języka angielskiego na maltański Vella Daryl Vella

Brožovaná

772 Kč

Estomac Et Cerveau: Etude Physiologique, Cinique Et Therapeutique (1884) Manuel Leven

Brožovaná

685 Kč

Das Verhaltnis Der Herbart'schen Psychologie Zur Physiologisch Experimentellen Psychologie (1900) Theodor Ziehen

Brožovaná

489 Kč

The Law As It Could Be gathers Fiss's most important work on procedure, adjudication and public reason, introduced by the author and including contextual introductions for each piece--some of which are among the most cited in Twentieth Century legal studies. Fiss surveys the legal terrain between the landmark cases of Brown v. Board of Education and Bush v. Gore to reclaim the legal legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. He argues forcefully for a vision of judges as instruments of public reason and of the courts as a means of shaping society in the image of the Constitution. In building his argument, Fiss attends to topics as diverse as the use of the injunction to restructure social institutions; how law and economics have misunderstood the role of the judge; why the movement seeking alternatives to adjudication fails to serve the public interest; and why Bush v. Gore was not the constitutional crisis some would have us believe. In so doing, Fiss reveals a vision of adjudication that vindicates the public reason on which Brown v. Board of Education was founded.